<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.takeninhand.com">
<channel>
 <title>Taken In Hand - DeeMarie</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/taxonomy/term/120/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en-local</language>
<item>
 <title>Is it ever OK to FORCE your wife to do something?</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/is.it.ever.ok.to.force.your.wife.to.do.something</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What if a wife really &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; doesn't want to do something her husband tells her to do? Is forcing her to do it OK in a &lt;a href="http://www.takeninhand.com/" class="site"&gt;Taken In Hand&lt;/a&gt; context? DeeMarie examines this important issue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:20:56 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>"No" means "take me"</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/no.means.take.me</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The aim of "No means no!" is to give men a simple way to avoid actually raping a woman. The problem is that no does &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; always mean no, and the denial of that reality makes it &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; likely that men will make mistakes than if that reality were acknowledged.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Strap-on Epiphany, by Virginia Vitzthum: a comment</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/strap-on.epiphany.by.virginia.vitzthum.a.comment</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;DeeMarie is on the case.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:07:51 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are you the Conan the Barbarian type?</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/are.you.the.conan.the.barbarian.type</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you're looking for a Conan the Barbarian type, the requirement that consent be explicit is a real drag. DeeMarie has some advice for any Conans out there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 02:17:31 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is chastity overrated?</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/is.chastity.overrated</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Since this seems to be a big issue in America, and there are thousands of Americans reading this site, I am putting a slightly shortened version of DeeMarie's readers' forum post about chastity on the front page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 04:32:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The importance of conquest</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/the.importance.of.conquest</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This brilliant article explains the need many &lt;a href="http://www.takeninhand.com/" class="site"&gt;Taken In Hand&lt;/a&gt; women feel to be decisively conquered by their man, and why less resistant-sounding forms of submission leave many women cold despite the fact that they do indeed want to submit to a man.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:57:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The submissive alpha female</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/node/489</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What is a submissive alpha female (or an &amp;#8220;alpha submissive&amp;#8221; woman, as a reader asked)? DeeMarie has the answer!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:25:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Has feminism gone too far?</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/node/434</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Let's all agree that we don't want to go back to a time when women had fewer legal rights than men, but has feminism gone too far, and what has its effect been on intimate male-led relationships?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:18:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A reality check for critics</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/node/432</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is it true that a good man would not get rough with a woman who likes that? Or that women who want to be dominated are misguided and na&amp;iuml;ve and will end up getting abused? Or that they should settle for a bit of spanking, DD, or BDSM instead?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:55:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Love and fear</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/love.and.fear</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In this fabulous article, DeeMarie argues that while love and fear might be incompatible emotions for some people, for others those two things are perfectly compatible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:27:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Asserting dominance physically forcefully</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/asserting.dominance.physically.forcefully</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Many women have little or no interest in being spanked but would enjoy being overpowered physically by a man. Who hasn't enjoyed rough-and-tumble &amp;#8216;wrestling&amp;#8217;, pillow-fighting, or tickling with a man who is much stronger?! So for those who are interested, here are some imaginitive physically forceful ways of exerting control.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:03:58 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dominance and forcefulness, and violence</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/dominance.and.forcefulness.and.violence</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In this fascinating piece, DeeMarie considers different definitions of the word &amp;#8220;violence&amp;#8221;, some appropriate, others entirely inappropriate in the context of &lt;a href="http://www.takeninhand.com/" class="site"&gt;Taken In Hand&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:42:24 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dominance, integrity and needing to feel superior</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/dominance.integrity.and.needing.to.feel.superior</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;More thoughts about dominant men and the mistake some insecure men make in thinking that being dominant means being right, superior, better than women.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:07:31 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alpha male dominance</title>
 <link>http://www.takeninhand.com/alpha.male.dominance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="http://www.takeninhand.com/" class="site"&gt;Taken In Hand&lt;/a&gt; relationship, the purpose of any physical force there may be is not correction but connection through dominant control. DeeMarie argues that if a man wants to be spanked, he has submissive tendencies that will be repulsive to some women reading &lt;a href="http://www.takeninhand.com/" class="site"&gt;Taken In Hand&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:17:43 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
