A strong willed woman wanting a man to lose against

I am attracted to independence and strength. I am also turned on by submissiveness and vulnerability. I am a strong man who does generally get what I want, but I'll never be able to mesh with a girl who can't take her own life in her own hands.

First, I think that a large reason why women often hide their feelings or desires is that they subconsciously want the man to dominate, but that takes skills that most men don't have, namely mind-reading. A woman who can't come out and fight for her needs can't control her own life. I can not live someone's life for her.

In an ideal dominant/submissive relationship we will both have control over our own lives, but when we clash and the circumstances are appropriate, I won't back down, and I will take control. If she is serious and feels strongly, then she should be able to convey that I need to see eye to eye with her. If she doesn't put up any fight about an important issue then there is a serious problem. And if she wants the excitement, she should start something that she knows she can lose. Or she can drop the right hints and I'll take the initiative, but if they're too vague it's her own fault that nothing happens.

Reading the things on this site have made me realize why my previous girlfriend got so deliciously frustrated when I won argument after argument. I would say something and she would take an opposing view that there was little defense for repeatedly. She was a strong willed woman seeking a man to lose against.

I like being dominant, but I don't like living up to unreal expectations. A woman has to take control of her own life and learn how to effectively relate and communicate with people before she is ready to share it with someone. It fulfills my heart to protect and provide, but only when the other is doing what is in her power to carry her own weight. That takes the strength and independence I look for.

I also don't like degradation or violence. If a woman wants to be insulted she can find other company. I think highly of the women I love, and though I am excited by control, I'll use my power to bring pleasure and satisfaction into our lives. Personally I think that women who want that are probably associating negative attitudes too closely with dominant attitudes when it is only the latter that they crave.

Broderick W.

Take the Taken In Hand tour


Have you seen the following articles?
The erotic power of unshackled male dominance
What Taken In Hand is, and what it is not
Women want men who are more dominant
When I'm in overdrive...
Changing for myself
Creating un unbreakable bond of love takes time
Brought to submission
What kind of site is this? D/s? TPE? CP? DD? ABCD?
I want it all, and I want it now!
Actions speak louder than words

Control?

Quotes, ....'I won't back down and I will take control...
and, ...'I am excited by control'....

Are you indeed? If you are looking for strength and independence in a woman then perhaps you are seeking someone to look after you?

Yikes...

Wow, I didn't get that at all. I get what he's saying...that's it's no fun to dominate for the sake of dominating. Stick up for yourself, put up a fight. No one likes a namby pamby...even on this site! LOL

I love strong women

Sorry Anonymous, but let me get this straight: "I like strong women" means "I am a weak man who wants someone to look after me"? Not at all seeing the logic here -- care to elaborate?

Love the article by the way. This is very much the kind of relationship with the kind of woman that I want for myself.

Different interpretations of the article

I've been looking at this site for some time now and often wondered how on earth anyone could have the courage to actually come forward and say anything in public.

Desires and fantasies and needs seem to be such a private thing and to actually air them for the world to read appeared to me to be either extremely foolhardy or brave, please choose your own interpretation.

Upon reading these last posts however, I plucked up my courage to register. Max, I am the writer of the anonymous post.

When I read the original article, it frightened me.

Because:- I was in a relationship that I entered quite willingly because I was looking for a dominant man, the reasons too private to go into in the public domain, but all to do with my always having had to shoulder huge responsibilities that became just too much for me to bear.

As the relationship progressed it slowly became apparent that this man had seen some kind of 'strength' in me which he then began to feed off, and once again, I was the one doing all the caring and not getting any of the loving dominance I needed in return - just control. This was the complete opposite to what I actually needed. Please read 'need' there and not 'want'.

I read the article as implying a relationship where 'control' was the order of the day, with alot of arguing and the writer wanting to win at any cost, rather than gently, but firmly, leading a woman along the right path, which is what I'd thought this site was all about, i.e. a loving dominance.

This is arbitary control, not loving dominance, and there is a subtle difference here in my mind.

The relationship I had was an absolute disaster in the end, and I had to finish it, because I no longer had anything left within me to fight someone else's corner, and no strength left to argue back - which I always hated anyway because it denied me my right to femininity (as I see it).

I am not a namby pamby! In my life, and the experiences I have had, I have had to draw upon strengths so deep inside me that it nearly destroyed me. Unless you've been there yourself you will have no conception of what I am talking about. I would suggest that I am extremely strong, in fact. However, if I have to constantly argue because a man doesn't instinctively understand what I am saying because he loves me, and if he really loves me then he should make it his business to find out, gently, what makes me tick, then where is the love?

I suppose what I am trying to say is if I am going to submit authority to a man, then I would like that he take it as the greatest gift I can give.

All I can say now is that I apologise if I have offended anyone. If I've got the original article wrong, then I'm sorry.

I am not looking for a Superman, but a Super Man. These men do exist, because there is someone in my life now who is helping me enormously along my path.

Lois Lane.

What you see depends on your perspective

I am surprised by your interpretation of the article, Lois! The writer was talking about what women want, and that is about consent. He was not talking only about what he wants. I think that to interpret this article so negatively as you appear to have done, you must be viewing it through your own ideas and experiences. When I read the stuff about women wanting a man to lose against, I envisaged a fun and friendly battle like Eric wrote about in his article. I have seen many women absolutely loving being playfully teased by a man -- and indeed, whatever is wrong with having a good argument if it is friendly? That is what I take the writer to mean. I see no evidence that he was talking about anything negative. Indeed, look at his last line, and indeed the entire last paragraph. He seems to be quite clearly wanting to distinguish what he is talking about, from negative or abusive stuff.

And hey, if Max likes the article, I'd say that that is evidence that there is no whiff of anything remotely non-consensual or otherwise nasty in it. :-)

People can find whatever interpretations they want to in anything, I suppose, but notice that people of good will disagree, and when that is the case, why not interpret it positively instead of assuming that it is an evil monster writing? Life is a lot more pleasant that way!

Friendly Arguments.

the boss,

I re-read the article after reading your reply and tried to look at it from a different perspective as you suggested.

I can see your point. I actually do love to be teased in a fun and friendly way by a man and there is certainly nothing harmful in friendly arguments, as long as that is what they are.

I suppose one can only be influenced by personal experience, and to be honest I am trying hard to look at things positively these days, rather than negatively, and I am getting there, believe it or not!

I do like this site by the way - and I wouldn't be visiting it if it didn't offer the kind of things I am looking for.

Thankyou.

Lois.

It's about Attitude and Balance

Many people have expressed confusion, so let me clarify.

Loving dominance, as I understand it, defines the structure of the relationship. In our individual lives each person has to be captain of his/her own ship. Our lives and our relationships mix together, so when an issue comes up that requires support in the relationship it must take on a give-and-take structure because it isn't just within the relationship. The attitude of loving dominance may be there, but the actions are necessarily different. The strength I'm looking for in a woman is the strength to act and assert herself in her own life and in the places where her life is effected by our relationship.

In actuality, dominance is entirely attitude. A man is not more capable of emotionally or intellectually dealing with life events than a woman. He is usually physically stronger, but that doesn't give him greater capacity than what is human in most situations.

When either the man or the woman in a relationship encounters an event that hits them hard, the relationship would not be healthy if the other did not do everything in his/her power to help. It has to go both ways, otherwise the person who can't give back is probably looking for a mother or father.

Also, no man anywhere will ever be able to instinctively understand what a woman says because he loves her. Understanding comes from taking the time to observe, listen, and get to know the other. Even then there will be situations where the man won't understand because not enough information was conveyed. A guy should make the effort to find out what makes you tick if he loves you, but communication skills vary, and the chances are you'll have to volunteer information.

Dominance to me is, as the boss suggested, more lighthearted. It may be expressed seriously or even ferociously, but it's all about attitude, and if the other doesn't love it there's something wrong.

Lastly, kudos to Lois for contributing. I value your comment, and I think you'll find that most things that people consider private are in fact simply sensitive issues that everyone can relate to. I hope what I have said is valuable to you as well. You may consider it gentle but firm guidance.

Gentle but Firm guidance.

Broderick,

Your last paragraph said it all to me, and I thank you so much for being so kind after my anonymous post. Understanding is everything.

Lois.

My Pleasure

Lois,

You are very welcome. It's my pleasure.

Sincerely,
Broderick

Be a Mind Reader

Personally, I think the majority of women are strong willed and independent because they have to be, not because they want to be...and they do want a man to read their mind and take control.

But I will push just to see if the man will push back. If he doesn't push back, then I will push us both right over the edge. One of us has to have the control to save us both from falling.

I am attracted to self-assured dominant men. I love my own independence and power. I also would love for man to take control of mine in order to enhance the relationship for the both of us.

I consider myself submissive, but maybe too strong willed to give it up so easily. Read my mind. Prove you are strong enough to handle me. Take it from me and the rest will flow like water to quench the thirst of us both.

It's all in the mind......

Xena,

I learnt a valuable lesson from Broderick. He's actually right. You cannot read someone else's mind. Man is not God.

The right man for you will be able to coax some of your desires from you - he will be able to start the whole thing off - but, he will need a little bit of help, otherwise he may have to spend years peeling back the layers to find out what makes you tick - and by then he'll probably be bored stupid - Or, you will find yourself with a control freak, masquerading as a loving dominant....

To reach what you seek takes courage. And courage is being able to state, clearly, what you seek, otherwise it is a taking without giving. It IS hard - I know, because I'm still coming to terms with it myself - and struggling to actually get the words out of my mouth.

But all it needs is one little step....and then your journey will begin.

Lois Lane.

Right on.

You make me want to give you a hug, Lois. You warm my heart.

I'd also like to add that men too fantasize about mind-reading women. I used to dream about finding a girl who had such a connection with me and such feminine intuition that she would know my deepest desires without my having to wrestle with the words. But now I practice that tool that I'm sure everyone has heard of, "When __ happens I feel __ because __." (I know you're rolling your eyes at that.)

I'm pretty sure that most conflicts are misunderstood misunderstandings. If you just knew that it was a miscommunication in the first place then much of the frustration wouldn't be necessary. People naturally relate and understand when they are told about human struggles. We are all human; its just about learning to let people know what's going on.

This doesn't have to fly in the face of the Taken In Hand ideas. Just talk about it.

Exactly!

You could not have said it more perfectly, Lois.

Maybe saying, "be a mind reader" was putting it a lil strong.

But at least I want a man that can sense my needs, and lead the way.
I will follow.

Broderick

I read your article on a "strong willed woman wanting a man to lose against". I wholeheartedly agree with your comment, except for the "violence" part which I will comment on in the end of my paragraph. I myself am an extremely independant woman. I have taught myself to never rely on a man's money or anything. I am smart, and not afraid to stand up to anyone, including men.

As the comment goes, how can a man respect a woman who can't respect herself. Others may or may not agree with me on this, because of the old adage where if a woman lets a man spank her or dominate her she is not respecting herself, I disagree. A woman who is independant I feel can also have a man completely control her as well. This is a strong woman like myself who knows what she wants. For example: A woman and her husband disagree on a subject, she communicates her side, and he his side. Say they still do not agree. He should ultimately have the last word wether she pouts or not.

When a woman independant or not has a dominant man who shows his presense, meaning he walks into a room, and you know he rules that roost, yet he's kind, loving, carries a firm hand, but gentle, that woman has a good man in my book. On the violence issue, a spanking can go a long way in a relationship. Sometimes a woman needs it, keeps her in her place.

OWWW my brain hurts

I am soooo confused........

I am a bit of a metaphor queen so stay with me one this-
I consider a pretty strong independent type of girl- I could take this big bad world head on all by myself if I have to but the truth of the matter is I just don't want to do it all by myself. I'm a fighter, in my life any time the war cry is sounded I am right there on the front line sword at the ready shield in place...so to speak....and I'll never be one of the women who stay behind and let the men do all the fighting it's just not me. But at the same time I don't want to LEAD the fight I hate that. I want someone who knows what they are doing leading the fight. I am looking for a champion that will have my back as I have his, but lets just be honest here he's got to be the better fighter. And if he is then he gets to see the softer vulnerable submissive side- but you're gonna prove yourself capable of protecting her better than I can, other wise why bother?
And what's all this captain our own ship talk? I though the point was we'd be on 1 ship? Just 1..... he'd be the captain I'd be the first mate or whatever????

Being a woman who hasn't had the chance to experience a relationship like this-but wants to-, it's a bit confusing. Especially being a woman that wouldn't want to give some one blanket consent to do what he wants- I'm a bit too hands on for that- So in some ways I like what you're saying here Broderick.... sounds like I might have some hope of finding someone yet.... but then I get lost. do you find that arguments are fun or am I just misreading this?

"And if she wants the excitement, she should start something that she knows she can lose. Or she can drop the right hints and I'll take the initiative, but if they're too vague it's her own fault that nothing happens.
Reading the things on this site have made me realize why my previous girlfriend got so deliciously frustrated when I won argument after argument."

Personally I'm not a fan of arguing for the sake or "fun" of an argument... debate? Playful jesting that sets up a rousing game of show me who's boss? sure I'm game!

Not all women want mind readers- some of us find that kind of behavior to be ridiculous- more power to you if it works for you, just saying I could never stand putting myself in that constant state of annoyance. I speak my mind pretty clearly to be honest, and if you need me to I will draw parallels and use metaphors or charts if need be...... I would never presume to ask someone to "know what I feel". I find that communication is a lot easier than waiting for someone to tweak their psychic powers to my signals.

Anyways this really got me thinking ...from the original post to the last comment so I thought I'd add my own jumbled thoughts and one more question for Broderick....where you speak of violence.... are you speaking of spanking? Cuz they don't have to be violent- they can be a lot of fun =)

Mindreaders

Mindreading? I do not think any of us can really read another person’s mind. But we can read the clues. We are all empathic to a degree (except you sociopaths out there), the human psyche is hard wired to do so. When in a primitive state, our species had to read the body language of the predators to know if it was safe to move past them or if they were preparing for attack. The male of our species had to know if the female was receptive for mating to advance our species. The female had to know if the male was in a rage to avoid potential harm. Etc., etc., etc. What I am trying to point out is that the ability to read another person’s body language is bred into us. It may well be tied to the flight or fight reaction, I really do not know as this is not my area of expertise. What I do know is I can see others using it every day even when they do not realize it. We can read the “signs” if someone is happy or angry or frustrated. I have never seen anyone, man or woman, that can totally control their body to the point of having no body language at all. Just the fact they are trying to do so exposes it.

What am I trying to say with this? It is simple really. We all use these sorts of clues with those we interact with, even total strangers at all times. A warm friendly smile can encourage strangers to speak to you in grocery stores. I know, it happens to me all the time. My kids use to be amazed at that. A stiffing of the body, cold or burning eyes can reflect anger or hurt. The list goes on and on. Each of us are born with the ability, we just have to hone our skills. No, this is not mindreading, but it is not rocket science either. If you love someone, you should be developing the skills to recognize the signals that will tell you what that person is feeling or thinking. It will not be exact. It will not be perfect. It will give you the beginnings of opening up a discussion to find out the reason for the body language.

I think of myself as a strong willed woman and survivor. I have spent all my adult life honing my skills at reading body language. I use it every time I go to work and it has saved numerous lives when I picked up on something the person did not tell me or could not. But in many ways I do throw out conflicting signals too. I may smile but my eyes will reflect that I am in pain. The point is that if you know me and are interested enough to learn my signals, you will then ask about it. You will be able to “read my mind” enough to recognize a problem exists and can then talk with me about it. This is why I want to become involved with a man who takes charge. The ones I have known in the past would ask. It is an amazing feeling to be able to release the doubts, get advice, have a shoulder to cry on. I want that in my personal relationship also.

Broderick W. said in the OP that “A woman who can’t come out and fight for her needs can’t control her own life. I can not live someone’s life for her.” No strong woman would want you to. We can do most things competently and independently, thank you very much! But what we do want and need is someone to be a sounding board when we are confused or conflicted and will offer constructive suggestions not criticism. We need to have someone who can hold up the world for us when it becomes too much and we need to retreat and regroup. We need someone that can tell us “enough!” when we try to take on too much and become frustrated with ourselves and everyone around us. We need to have someone that can love us in the good times and bad without making us feel like a subspecies. Yes we can live our own lives but if we wanted to do it alone, we would not need you!

Libby

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.