Brought to submission

When a woman has settled for a man who is not quite strong enough to dominate her, she accommodates his lack of strength by making it possible for him to be stronger than her.

A strong woman does not submit; she is brought to submission. She doesn't lie down; she is swept up. A strong woman does not yield nor defer to a strong man. A strong woman is able to flex her strength without fear of overpowering her truly stronger man.

Such a woman is the rock of strength that a true leading man can lean on. When she is moved to his will or molded to his desire, it is because of his strength, not because of her lack of strength. With such a woman, and only with such a woman, a strong man can release his strength. She can feel his true power.

In those moments when my strong woman and I are alone, we share our strength with each other. She is bent to my will and becomes the object of my passion.

If anyone outside our relationship were to see us at those moments, they might think she was being abused, but she isn't. Those moments are her most serene, when she is able to revel in the pleasures of womanhood.

The name of this web site says it all. It isn't “Putting myself in his hands”, it's “Taken in Hand”.

Take the Taken In Hand Tour


Have you seen the following articles?
I don't want to be a servant or slave
How I turned the fantasy into reality
My deep dark secret
Who needs forbidden fruit when you have this?
Is he who (or where) he says he is?
Why you should not withhold spanking!
Does it have to hurt to be Taken In Hand?
Don't go into your cave, get out your preferred implement!
Looking into the mirror of life
Women want men who are more dominant

Taking a woman in hand

This writer talks about bringing a woman to submission. I guess I don't want to mold anybody to my will or bring anybody to submission but I do like a resistant woman and I am dominant. The writer says:

The name of this web site says it all. It isn't “Putting myself in his hands”, it's “Taken in Hand
Nice! I like that. Gotta agree with you there.

Mediaeval Quests?

A somewhat whimsical thought just struck me after reading this article (blame the painkillers) – when a strong woman wishes to be taken in hand, it almost takes on the air of quests in the chivalric romances. In short:

Strong, desirable woman says to knight of her choice: You can have me, I will submit to you, but only if you prove that you're worthy of it by proving your strength and your courage. Knight wanders off to slay dragons, conquer evil lords, see the good in spiteful & haggard crones, and generally does what everyone else has deemed impossible. All these obstacles could very easily be allegorical references to her own strength being "bested" by someone strong enough to not be scared by her.

--

"There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" Hamlet, somewhere.

Bringing a person to submission

No one can speak for all women or all men. Some women want to give submission and the desire is touched off by meeting a dominant man. Some want to be brought to submission, and need to fight it. Some don't care to submit at all.

I've met men who want a woman to "bring them to submission." I've asked them, how on earth do they expect me to do that, when I am about half their size? Their answer, of course, is that it is psychological.

But I am not looking for a fight, I am looking for harmony. So I do not take on a battle with a man who needs to be subdued. Let him go take up mud wrestling. Me, I enjoy a man who wants to give himself to me. It's a turn on. It works for me. I love it.

ILSA LASLOW

Strong Willed

In my experience, living with a very strong willed woman who is very capable of taking care of herself, full of pep, very witty and has a tremendous amount of respect and trust in me as I do for her, Taken in Hand is great for us. I feel that dominant and submissive are independent from strong and weak.
GT has told me countless times since giving unconditional consent how extremely sexy it is when she gets the look. She loves the secure feeling and the protected feeling that comes with being taken in hand.
Surrounding GT and Taken In Hand is a true passion of mine. Submission is taken or earned if you will. Once you have earned your lady's trust, submission is there to be taken. It is also my feeling that it takes a very strong women to submit and let go of what she has had control of.
I would find it hard to believe that a strong willed women would try to find comfort and connection with a lesser-willed man. Taken in Hand seems to be geared around dominance and submission along with a host of other dynamics, and has improved our already good relationship.

Respectfully, Race

brought to submission

Ooooh! Just reading makes me tingle!

That is my biggest issue with being "taken in hand". I want to know that the strengths I have nurtured in myself will be accepted as part of who I am, and not as a challenge to his strengths.
The thought of wrestling for authority and then choosing to submit because he has proven himself stronger in ALL ways, not just strength (and really, physical strength is the lowest issue in a "taken in hand" relationship, isn't it?) is the ultimate in my books.

More tingling!

Think on This

When a woman submits, there is a rush to reassure herself and everyone else that in fact she is a strong willed and independent minded person. The words, "The lady doth protest too much," spring to mind.

But when a man wishes to submit, it is assumed he is lesser-willed and weak. Hm. Why does it "take a strong woman to submit" but it doesn't "take a strong man to submit?"

Is there not an apologia going on here for women who submit? Some are strong, but how absurd to assume that is universally true. I have met women who identify as submissive and they are not strong nor independent minded. They are weak-willed, foolish, and prey to anything in pants that calls himself a Dominant. They are not representative of the whole, but by the same token, it is ridiculous to laud submissive women in general as being "strong willed."

Even the more absurd to turn around and assume that a man who wants to subsume his superior strength to a woman's dominance must NOT be strong.

Yes, Mediaeval Quests

Agreed. Part of the reason that Knight/Dragon/Lady stories are so popular is that they resonate with an inner desire in both men and women.

There is also a bit of a fear factor involved. If the knight is so powerful that he can slay dragons, he is also powerful enough to "have his way" with the lady. She lives under his protection, safe from any danger except the danger of the knight himself.

Molding her to his will

I wonder, Eric, if a certain amount of molding is inevitable in relationship between one who is dominant and another who is dominated, even if the domination is slight.

You may not wish intend to mold her and you might not want to bring her to submission, but your own natural dominance brings about the molding and submission nonetheless.

Of course it is a matter of degrees but I suspect that a strong component of a desire to submit is a desire for the molding that submission brings about.

re: Strong Willed

Race noted:

I would find it hard to believe that a strong willed women would try to find comfort and connection with a lesser-willed man.
One of the repeated themes on this website is that of women who are not able to find men to take them in hand. One reason that a strong woman might try to find that comfort with a lesser-willed man is that there aren't enough dominant men to go around.

It takes a strong woman to submit... to a strong man

But when a man wishes to submit, it is assumed he is lesser-willed and weak. Hm. Why does it "take a strong woman to submit" but it doesn't "take a strong man to submit?"

Women do not need to be strong to submit. However, a strong man often needs a woman to be strong if she is going to submit to him.

A strong man could not use his full strength with a too-weak woman. He would have to hold back in order to avoid crushing her (metaphorically and/or literally).

So, the point is, if a woman wants to submit to a strong man, she must be strong in her own right in order to meet his strength. Thus, the best hope for a taken in hand relationship might be between a man and woman who are nearly matched in strength.

Strength intertwined with dominance

From the home page, in reference to this thread...

This author understands the desire many women feel to be brought to submission rather than handing it to a man on a plate. He does not make clear (and perhaps even disagrees) that strength/weakness is independent of dominance/submission; nevertheless, this is a piece that will speak to many readers.
I do, in fact, disagree - at least in part - with the notion that strength/weakness is independent of dominance/submission.

Strength is intertwined with dominance and submission and it is a requirement for both. He must have some combination of physical/emotional/spiritual/other strength in order to dominate.

She must also be strong enough to meet his strength. If not, the relationship would be destructive.

Door Mats are Boring

I wonder if truly strong people would be happy with weak people. I think that if you are a strong person, male or female, then you would find a weak person, a door mat, pretty boring. What kind of true give and take can you have with a weak person?

To be happy I need someone who matches my strength. If my husband was weak I would not respect him. Weakness of character makes me feel disgust actually. I have no patience or time for weakness. I do submit to him, but my submission has nothing to do with weakness. I have learned that I can be strong and submissive at the same time and that is what my husband wants.

Strength is what makes the whole relationship sexy. We are both strong people. Neither of us would be happy married to a weak person. I am not sure that I agree that it takes a strong woman to submit, but I think it is definitely more interesting for the man when the woman submitting to him is strong! My strong man makes life more interesting to me too!

Take care all,
Tevemer

Brought to submission

The name of this web site says it all. It isn't “Putting myself in his hands”, it's “Taken in Hand”.

Why is it so hard to get this point across? Well said!

I am not here because I want to debate this point, I am here because I WANT to be taken in hand. I both love and trust the man I long to submit to. I am a strong woman, and proud of it. I am not afraid to admit that as strong as I am, within me lies a deep and lasting desire to submit. I can "submit" at any time by playing submissive to a male "dominant", however that is both meaningless and empty and ultimately devastatingly sad and empty. If I have to play the part of a submissive taken in hand woman, I am effectively denying expression of my true desire...to be dominated...take in hand....by someone who is neither afraid to express his nature and who loves me enough to be that person that I so desperately need.

As this writer said, I am not "putting myself in the hands" of anyone, I am being taken in hand.

Why is that so hard to accept? I fear that the more honest men on this site, who speak to what women such as myself really want and need, the more naysayers there are that decry them.

Honest debate allows naysayers....but it also allows me to stand up and say YES...take me in hand, I am strong enough to know that it is both what I want and what I am and what I need. To be taken in hand is what lead me to this site, and as long as there are people brave enough to express the desire to take someone in hand, that will keep me here.

Submissive or Brought to Submission?

Having followed this discussion for some time, I must say I still haven't got a clue what the difference is between being submissive or being brought to submission, I think the distinction is too subtle for me. I mean, I can't really see how you can be brought to submission if you are not willing to submit, and if you are willing to sbumit, then you are submissive, aren't you?

I would just like to remark though that I am submissive (mostly) to my husband, not because I am weak or a doormat or anything, but because I find it very, very sexy (and, yes, kinky too).

Submissive to One not Submissive to all

Hey Louise!

This is an interesting question. I think when I say that I am not submissive, yet I am submissive to my husband, or brought to submission by him, the difference I mean is that I am not normally submissive at all. I actually have a fairly aggressive personality. I do submit to my husband however. And like you I find that very, very sexy! I guess I make him work for it a bit too. I expect him to show his strength to me; I do not hand it to him on a platter. In that way I sometimes make him "make" me submit. Most people would be surprised to see me submit to anyone. In general then, no I am not submissive, except to one person who has very much earned, and continues to earn, my submission. Does this make any sense?

Take care,
Tevemer

Submissive or Brought to Submission?

LouiseC wrote, in part:

... I still haven't got a clue what the difference is between being submissive or being brought to submission, ... I mean, I can't really see how you can be brought to submission if you are not willing to submit, and if you are willing to submit, then you are submissive, aren't you?
It is a distinction about which person is trying to make it happen or which person is leading the process.

Many of the women who write here initiated the process with their men and had to bring him around to the idea of accepting her submission. ("I want you to be the HoH in our relationship and take me in hand.") These women were not brought to submission.

Being brought to submission means that the person who submits is *not* the one who initiates the process. ("From now on, I'm going to be the HoH and I am taking you in hand.")

Someone who is brought to submission might not have been submissive to start with or might not have been aware of her inner submissiveness. He may have awakened something within her or helped to create something within her.

But there is yet another kind of woman who is submissive and knows she is submissive but will only submit submit to the strongest of men. She does not seek to submit. She submits if and when he uses sufficient strength to win her over.

This woman is submissive but must be brought to submission. She will not go there on her own.

Not quite that cut-and-dried

An anonymous poster said that if the woman said she wanted her husband to be HoH, then she wasn't being brought to submission. from my own experience, I'm not sure it's anywhere near that cut and dried.

I suggested the idea to my husband, because I thought it would work for us (as it turns out, he did too - but I tink he was planning on a more subtle approach to things).

However, he very definitely brings me to submission. Not all the time - there are times when I submit to him. But none-the-less, he does.

--

"There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" Hamlet, somewhere.

Love this statement

But there is yet another kind of woman who is submissive and knows she is submissive but will only submit submit to the strongest of men. She does not seek to submit. She submits if and when he uses sufficient strength to win her over.

This is the kind of woman I identify with. I think/believe that to get me to a point of being won over by a man like this, I would have to be totally exhausted from his stength. His physical strength. I am a fighter...even if I think in the slightest way that I am wrong...I will keep fighting, and will only fight until I am overpowered...physically. This has never happened for me. I will say though, that if I could safely and trustingly bring out a man's full strength is also very powerful for me. Almost like giving him a gift...letting him bring himself to get that out. Be who he is.(Not abusive behavior)I have not found this kind of man and I don't think anyone like this is out there. I have just about given up. Most men are scared of me. I am not only very strong minded but am physically strong from being so independent. I find that I really don't need to bother with men unless they can prove any contribution can come from them. Like dominance and confidence if their mind and abilities....but also be loving and protective of me as well. The return and combination would be explosive growth for both of us...but is there really such men out there, and how do you find them safely?

Is he out there?

The trouble could be that you want two things that don't necessarily go together. You want a man who will fight you and overpower you physically, but nice men do not, on the whole, do that sort of thing (unless by prior arrangement). If you want a man to do it spontaneously, you may have a long wait. You also want a man who is loving and protective, but men who are like that may not be the kind who will want to overpower you physically (unless, as I mentioned, they know in advance that this is what you want). Men who want to overpower women physically are not necessarily the kind who are particularly well-disposed towards women, or protective of them.

Re: Love this statement

This was very interesting to read. It reminded me a lot of myself even though I don`t think I`m as strong as you are. To me it was kind of like that too, my husband had to show me first that he`s really stronger then me, physically and mentally. But that doesn`t mean that I`m less intelligent. I wouldn`t just give my submission without him being willing to fight for it. We`ve been into this life style for years now and I don`t put up as much of a fight anymore, because pleasing him is what I really want to do. But I know that if I would fight against it, he would be strong enough to bend my will and that gives me a very good and secure feeling.

Is he out there?

My Husband is a real nice man who is very protective over me but he will fight me and overpower me physically if I don`t obey him. I wouldn`t want it no other way. There is a difference between being a bully and a dominant man. And I think the author of that post is sensible and confident enough to know the difference.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.